Thursday, December 5, 2019

The Relic


Well, I thoroughly enjoyed reading “The Relic.” I found it entertaining and fast paced, even when the characters started using scientific language I didn’t totally understand. I’ve never seen the movie, but I was told it was pretty good and that the book was better. Famous words of just about every book turned movie.
This book was a good step away from what I’m used to reading for classes, and because it was entertaining and mysterious, I really allowed myself to just sit back and enjoy it rather than being critical of it. The writing is simple, and the descriptions made it easy to visualize what things looked like (except Mbwun.) I’ve only been to one natural history museum, and it was the Field Museum in Chicago, so I had some background as to what a museum like the one in the book would look like. The National Museum of Natural History in New York is, I’m assuming, the actual museum this was based on, but I watched the trailer for the movie and the one for the movie takes place in the Field Museum in Chicago. I’ll admit, the biggest thing that happened to me while reading the book was that I really want to go to more Natural History museums. Just…not because a museum beast is killing everyone.

I didn’t dislike any of the main cast/PoVs. I think this was another reason the story moved so quick. Often times, when books switch PoVs like this one did, I end up skipping the parts which take place around characters I dislike. I would say, of all the characters, Margo felt the plainest, but I still had no reason to dislike her. She is a doer and that’s what I cared about most. I get worried about female characters sometimes being outshone by their male counterparts, and I was very happy that she got to be a part of Mbwun’s defeat. The other female character felt like she did a 180 from how she was throughout the beginning. Rickman went from being the overconfident, snooty big mouth to the scared little girl. I feel like, as the audience, we didn’t see enough of her and her change to have had her presented like she was in the ending after they get trapped in the exhibit. I get the psychology behind panic and such, but it just didn’t feel natural.

This doesn’t just go for Rickman, who is just one example of one of the characters doing an unpredictable switch, many of the characters felt this way. Switchback, probably my favorite character because of how arrogant and annoying he is, felt pretty forced in the ending. I don’t think how he acted was at all realistic in the opposite sense of how Rickman’s switch seemed overdone with panic. However! I liked all the stuff he did, from eating falling food from the spread to his lack of fear of dying and obsession with making big money. He was very one dimensional, but it didn’t bother me. He worked well as the comedic relief.

The only major criticism I have about the book as a whole is the reveal of the defeat of the monster. The entire second half of the book leads up to it and the cut off to another character before the final blow didn’t work for me. I think it would have been better to describe, in detail, how it died in real time rather than as a story the characters relay. The way Pendergast and Margo came waltzing in made me think, at first, that they had pledged their allegiance to Mbwun in order to survive…which would have been a really fun twist, I think. I see that Pendergast has his own series so it wouldn’t work in that sense.

The best simile I can come up for how this book read for me is it was like watching someone bake a cake for me, frost it, decorate it, cut the slice, put it on the plate, and then tell me how it tasted. BUT THEN someone comes along, someone who altered the recipe somewhere along the line, and tells you it wasn’t a cake, it was a cookie that looked like a cake.

And one last comment I’ve mentioned already in the Roachmeos and Julie-8 legs discord is I hate the word “gingerly” and it is used too many times in the story!


3 comments:

  1. It seems like mostly every post I have read, the consensus in the mysterious aspect was great. You know me and my over obsession for all things gory, so this could be a bias. (It is a bias LOL). I felt the mystery dragged at times. Overall, the book was great. I loved the vast character cast, the idea, and the monster. Just some parts felt like the mystery was trying too hard to stay one.

    I love when novels swap PoV's. I feel like it is like adding spices to your food while cooking. It gives the reader something to keep them going and a desire to compare the PoV's they are reading. World War Z's layout was one of my favorites because of this. I found myself comparing the last survivor tale to the one I just finished and so on. I also feel on PoV can drag at times (all books drag at some point, whether it is a page or half of it). I find this more common in works that ONLY keep one point of view. Breeding Ground is a good example here. At times, the narration so focused on Matt just took me out. Even Children of Time, the spider PoV's were the ONLY savior of the work. The human PoV was painful. So, it does go both ways for me. (He should have just written the whole thing from the spiders' views and axed the humanity ones. Not only would it have been easier to read with this one view, but he could've saved us all at least 250 pages of our time and oxygen.) That long explanation is I see your point with bouncing views, but also disagree for the purpose of this one.

    YES! The monster death was horribly botched. Shoe and I do not know how these two were not sent back the initial manuscript being told to fix it. Instead, it ended up published with this disaster? All the wonderful suspense and mystery was SHOT in cold blood by the botched killing.

    LOL at the cake and cookie thing. I wanted to add it looked like a cake, and then my head was forcibly slammed into it after someone cut that slice is how it made me feel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your idea of Pendergast and Meg somehow becoming servants of Mbwun and then seeking out the other humans is pretty interesting. I'm even sure there would have been a cool way to make that work. But the best part of that idea is that it is actually a good explanation why they didn't have the death of the monster ON THE PAGE! Boy I hated getting that second hand while Pendergast told Garcia. What a let down.

    Overall I felt the characters were pretty flat, but that scene where Smithback was eating under the table was hilarious. And it was probably the brightest moment of giving depth to a character in the entire book. It was a nice change from the constant crap about how bad he wanted to write his book on his terms. That got really old.

    Did you think that knowing for sure there was a monster in the book (because we are reading it in a monsters class) affected how you read the book at all? I find myself wondering at what point would I have believed there actually was a monster, if I hadn't already known for sure there was one. Perndergast didn't believe it until he saw it, and because he was probably the main character I liked the best, I probably wouldn't have believed it any earlier than that myself. Almost like, "once Pendergast knows for sure, then I 'll know for sure" kind of thing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh my god, I couldn't stop seeing the word "gingerly" after you pointed out! Another word they overused that I couldn't stop seeing was "suddenly," a major pet peeve of mine—it always strikes me as such a lazy way of creating tension. But I do agree that the book was enjoyable to read, and I definitely would have read it even if it hadn't been assigned for class. I did have a bit of a problem with the number of POV's in the story and how often they shifted. It felt like every time tension started to build in the story, we'd hop into a different head. And while the transitions between POV's weren't as jarring as in some of the other books we've read, I still felt like it made it hard to really get into one character's perspective for any length of time. It almost felt like a TV show fading to black or cutting to commercial break at every climactic moment. I can see why they would want to do that to keep people reading in order to get back to the characters they left at a cliffhanger, but after a while it kind of deflated the tension for me. Like you said, I wished we could have seen the actual defeat of Mbwun rather than cutting to a different POV and hearing about it secondhand—and I feel like that critique could be leveled at most of the chapters in the book.

    ReplyDelete