I'm going to start off with how much I love the spider head.

And it reminds me a lot Krum from "Ah! Real Monsters."
I have never seen this film and it sure was a treat so close
to Halloween. I thoroughly enjoyed it: the setting, the monster, the cast.
I will admit I felt a few scenes dragged on a bit long, and
the choice of sound effects in the long scenes made it feel a bit longer. For
example, I don’t think the howling wind in the beginning with the helicopter
chasing down the malamute was engaging or interesting, and I was starting to
get confused as to how these guys were failing to shoot it and it was
off-putting. I suppose it is an example of how I was not buying into the “danger”
of the situation. In hindsight, I really like how it all plays together and how
the beginning shows how the whole story panned out for the Nords. It also shows
how the Nords were also just trying to stop the Thing from spreading. I still
think the beginning could have been presented better with the same effect. I also could not figure out why the dog was
over at the Norwegian camp in the first place, or if it was one of their dogs
that just decided to run in the direction of the next closest camp. The
American camp protects the dog like it is one of their own. I think this ended
up being one of the plot holes for me, and it was one that the story could do
without because they end up looking for and bringing back the frozen Thing to
the camp. I don’t think the dogs needed to be in the story at all, really. But
I will say that the dog part of the monster was my favorite. It also reminded
me of the Xenomorph baby when it pops out of the chest.
We discussed what it takes to depreciate the scare factor of
a monster, and I think the Thing is an excellent example of a monster that just
stays a scary monster. Its M.O. is to adapt and change, so really we’ve never
seen the Thing’s final form. It learns and hides. The potential for the monster
is limitless and I think that is the biggest scare factor for this monster. I
just want to know what it would look like after it has devoured and adapted to
every living organism on the planet. Probably a really badass monster. End of
the world type of scary.
Another thing that I really liked about this story was that
the ending is rather open. It isn’t a happy ending for anyone, including the
Thing, and the audience is left wondering whether the Thing has really been
defeated. I like to think that it wasn’t, and that the Thing is just diddling
around waiting for the next living thing to come by. It’ll happen eventually.
We all know it! I also like that the last two standing hate each other, don’t
trust one another, and we’re not really sure if they’re both Thing-less.
In the end, I really
enjoyed this movie. I felt it was fun to watch, the monster makeup and design
was excellent, and the scare was left to the monster and the feeling of “what’s
going to happen next.” I think this is a movie that is best left alone,
although I know there is a remake or sequel of some sort, mainly because one of
the reasons I feel it is effective is because of the unhappy/open ending. It is
a good example of how we know there has to be more to the story, but the ending
still acts as closure. Even if the Thing is dead there, it might be somewhere else
out there.
I also didn't think the beginning with the helicopter was very engaging, but often movies put scenic, unimportant clips behind credits, so maybe it was supposed to be like that? Also, I assumed since the dog was also a husky like the others, and huskies are sled dogs, I thought the dog at the beginning was one of the sled dogs for the Norwegians for sure.
ReplyDeleteI think the dogs were necessary to the plot in order to show how the virus can infiltrate and manipulate a host. It's a way to show not tell in a movie, especially in this sci-fi where the doc tells a lot verbally already.
I think the unknown/unhappy ending in The Thing was much more satisfying than the same type of ending in Night of the Living Dead. I was left wondering for a long time after the movie ended about different things, and that makes the movie lasting and impressionable.
Yeah, I think the helicopter scene at the opening was just something that was easy enough to follow while the opening credits rolled. It did get a little strange that they couldn't hit it, but it was effective enough that by the end of the opening credits, you knew the dog was important, and that something might off about it... that it was more than just a dog in the movie. You didn't know it was a monster, but you knew it had a role that was bigger than just the dog.
ReplyDelete