If
all of Barker's writing is like The Yattering and Rawhead I think he might be
one of my new favorite writers. I don't know exactly how to pinpoint what it is
that I like best about his writing from what I have read so far,
but my best guess is it is because the story is always moving forward. I think The
Yattering and Jack is an excellent example of the 7-point story arch pattern,
except if the Yattering is presented as the protagonist, he never actually
finds a way to defeat Jack. There are also more than just three attempts to
break Jack, but I would say the main three points can be lumped into his wife’s
suicide plus all of the little annoyances in the beginning, the three cat deaths,
and then the attack on the daughters at Christmas leading inevitably to the
Yattering becoming a servant of Jack. When breaking it down, it becomes a
little clearer on how the Yattering was succeeding at breaking Jack, but
because of Jack’s awareness of the Yattering, he can defeat his own emotional reactions.
It keeps the suspense going because they are both winning and losing the
battles at the same time. All the crazy things going on in the beginning have
some sort of detrimental outcome which, in reality, is a win for the Yattering.
However, Jack’s main goal being to survive and not be taken by the Yattering
means every time he doesn’t fall into corruption he has won. I think this back
and forth within the scene, and the sympathy the reader can feel for the
Yattering, keep the story moving forward at all times.
Like
Rawhead, I had a copy of the graphic novel, so the way the story and art was
presented felt like a U shaped roller-coaster track where the cars have seats
facing forward and backward, and it goes in favor of one then back to the other,
over and over up until the end. The denouement even holds this with the Yattering
reminding Jack that he’ll be rejected by Heaven for having dealings with him.
I
can’t speak for the short story example of the story, but the graphic novel
version does an excellent job at presenting two potential villains to the story
right from the beginning. Jack is presented in a hanging photo with a wicked
looking grin, and the Yattering is also grinning in the same manner. So really,
the only thing making the Yattering the antagonist or the monster is the fact
that he is what he is. As the story progresses, Jack is shown as just a kind,
easy-going, older man with family values. Toward the end, in the Yattering’s
final attempt, Jack’s expressions change to be similar to what they were
presented as in the hanging photo at the beginning. I know, before having read
any of it, I thought the artist was making out Jack to be a creeper of some
sort, just by the way his face was presented in comparison to all the other
pictures.
Overall,
I really enjoyed this story and I am glad to have read it, as well as viewed it,
in its graphic novel format. I’m looking forward to reading more work by
Barker.
"I can’t speak for the short story example of the story, but the graphic novel version does an excellent job at presenting two potential villains to the story right from the beginning. Jack is presented in a hanging photo with a wicked looking grin, and the Yattering is also grinning in the same manner. "
ReplyDeleteI didn't catch this on the first read through, so i went back to look at the parallels in the graphic novel. I liked the comparison, and I'm glad you pointed it out.
However, I didn't get any suspense from this story. I felt like I was watching a montage rather than a building up climax to a story. And, at the same time, I never felt at any point like the Yattering would win. I always felt Jack would come out on top.
I think it is difficult for me to label an antagonist in this story. Both Jack and the Yattering have equal qualities of one in my opinion. Maybe Jack's mother? Even though she hardly exists, it is her fault both of them are stuck in this situation.
ReplyDeleteIn regards to it being a perfect example of the seven point story structure, I am going to have to disagree. I think it fails to tie everything together. Why did Jack's mother do what she did? How did Jack know all these things? Why didn't Beelzebub know that Jack knew? How did we get to the end point? Aside from that point in structure, it fits the other six decently.
I hadn't thought to apply the seven-point story structure to this story, but I think you're right on the money. I think the rising tension worked for me for the most part, though I really struggled with the changing POV. I liked that you pointed out Jack needing to defeat his own emotional reactions, because in a sense, that almost makes me wonder if the Yattering did win, after all! He didn't end up driving Jack crazy, but maybe he did end up corrupting him. He never let on to the Yattering that he was suffering, but inside, he was growing more and more willing to sacrifice his daughters' sanity for the sake of winning the battle and enslaving the demon. I didn't read the graphic novel, but that's so interesting that the artist portrays the Yattering and Jack as having similar creepy grins... makes me wonder if my theory holds any water!
ReplyDelete